I've been an Ontario high school teacher for 25 years. I've come up with a sideshow based on Jordan Peterson's lectures to help combat the gender ideology and social justice movement. Do you know how best to share this resource?
Of course this is preposterous. We must all get behind Chanel. She has chosen her path of self respect and educational sanity. I still believe the woke are a little dog with a big bark. In time they will whimper and run. Chanel has to stand her ground. This is her remarkable contribution to school children everywhere.
Dear Chanel it truly is almost impossible for me to believe that the slides you showed can actually exist anywhere in Canada. I thank God every day my children are past the elementary stage. I fret for my grandchildren, to say this curriculum is toxic and vile, is honestly putting it kindly. Surely this kind of education can be removed completely from the school system, or else the school system needs to be disbanded completely!
Keep fighting the good fight, for you ARE on the right side of history on this.
"Gender ideology" - a farce inside a bigger farce, was brought in by a nefarious govn't in 2015, which has gone above and beyond to make it "a thing." Clue: Pride SEASON. Even the true gay community is against all of this!
One should honestly be asking, "Of the number of indoctrinated souls, how many were seen by "the medical society" and how many were given "drugs" to fight off superimposed, social media perpetuated and falsely identified depression because of it?"
And: How many of the pushers of this 'agenda' are getting paid to do so? Did they sell their souls for riches? Follow the money. ALWAYS follow the money!
TOO many hoaxes. Not enough TRUTHS!
When God says He is against it, opinions don't matter!
No matter how colorful, sideways, or "authoritative " the opinions are.
I'm continually dealing with this mindset at our school. The admin has jumped in with both feet and trying desperately to drag everyone else down under.
Since this is the 4rth time this "College" has harrassed you and attempted to intimidate you, once again threatening your teaching certificate (and arguably your livelihood as well; especially since I have heard you say that you "used to be a teacher", if memory serves), it's about time you got serious and simply indicted these bullies. The intimidation offence in Canada's Criminal Code reads, quote
423. (1) Every one who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of COMPELLING another person to ABSTAIN from doing anything that he has a lawful right to do, or TO DO anything that he has a lawful right to ABSTAIN from doing
(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or his spouse or children or INJURES HIS PROPERTY,
(b) intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats that in Canada or elsewhere, violence OR OTHER INJURY will be done to or PUNISHMENT WILL BE INFLICTED ON HIM or a relative of his, or that THE PROPERTY of any of them will BE DAMAGED
(c) persistently FOLLOWS that person from PLACE to place,
(d) hides any tools, clothes or other PROPERTY OWNED or USED by that person or DEPRIVES HIM OF THEM or HINDERS HIM in the USE OF THEM
(e) ... [irrelevant; talks about following a person on highway] ...
(f) ... [irrelevant; besets or watches someone in their dwelling] ...
(g) ... [again irrelevant; blocking a highway] ...
is GUILTY of an OFFENCE punishable on summary conviction. [endquote]
I presume, but I could be wrong about the presumption, that your teaching certificate is your property, even though it has been issued by a teaching authority to your person and may be removed from your person for a legal or so-called "just cause". As far as the Statute above is concerned, your teaching certificate could be the PROPERTY that the college and complainants want to deprive you of or hinder you from using in order to PUNISH you and/or to COMPEL you to ABSTAIN from further criticisms of the "woke" agenda. Arguably various "wokesters" are metaphorically persistently "following" you around social media and repetitively complaining about you to deprive you of your certificate.
Were I you, I wouldn't bother suing. It is a very simple thing to go to the police with a complaint or even directly to a Crown Prosecutor. You may also simply walk into any Court of Law in Ontario and lay an information against that "College" in accordance with Section 504. of Canada's Criminal Code which reads, quote:
504. Any one who, on reasonable grounds, believes that a person has committed an indictable offence may lay an information in writing and under oath before a justice and the justice SHALL receive the information where it is alleged
(a) that the person has committed, anywhere, an indictable offence that may be tried in the Province in which the Justice presides and that the person etc. etc.
The immediate objection would be that intimidation is a "summary conviction" offence, not an indictable offence, to which one could reply. Yes! But this offence might be considered extortion, contrary to Sect. 346. of the criminal code and may involve collusion between "wokesters" within the Ontario Teacher's College, contrary to Sect. 137. of Canada's Criminal Code --- given the repetitive complaints and harrassment from different individuals with the same apparent "modus" of silencing legitimate criticism of their doctrinaire behaviour.
Simply persuading a police officer to take your complaint in writing, which requires you to provide a copy to the person complained of, would, quite likely, scare the crap out of these bullies. But it would be much better to talk to a Crown Prosecutor --- given that they, quite often, do not like unreliable and often "prevaricating" snitches.
In sum, the law gives you much leeway with dimwitted bullies. Not so with James McMurtry. Ms. Mohammed and her mouthpiece have "got you", James, on factors "a." and "c." of Paragraph 23. of their Consent Resolution Agreement. So you must fight back against the falsity of factor "b.", which is the false part of their Criminal Code Sect. 321. C.C.C. false document "b" which is, quote "false in a material particular" and which justifies you "whistle-blowing" the fraud of the TRC and those so-called "Nations" which benefited from the fraudulent so-called "Day Scholars" suit initiated by the Secwepemc and joined by Cowessess etc. "Nations" in their 2015 Class Action suit vs. Canada. Tick Tock, James. I was mistaken when I said you only had until the 28th of August. It's by the 25th of August that they want a reply.
The only way the gender ideologists succeed is by continually claiming victim status and the aura of "more than human" that goes with it. The claimed victims are painted as more than human (in their suffering, their personal journey, their victory)--but their allies and protectors also gain this status. The corresponding implication is that anyone who is contrary to gender ideology is oppressive and evil. If this all sounds like Christianity appropriated and re-deployed--it is! Why and how? Well, in my view, the "progressive" postmodern mind has rejected all ties with Western meaning and tradition--and this includes rationality. Thus the postmodern "progressives" have put themselves entirely in the realm of the non-rational, the emotional, the subjective. But, because meaning and a sense of tradition are integral aspects of being human, then these same postmodern progressives--floating in their emotional subjectivity--have a desperate need for tradition and meaning. So they just start making up new things that they can attribute meaning and tradition to. These are all the Woke causes (more of which are being created/evolved every day, in the panic of the total irrational and meaning-less mind). But what is the structure and vehicle of these causes? Well, of course it is that very same Western tradition and meaning they rejected--but which has created, informed and cultivated our culture and our minds (like it or not) to begin with! And the biggest structure of it all is Christianity. Thus, if you look closely, you notice that Wokism adopts and redeploys all the tropes of Christianity: the sacrifice, victimhood and "more than human" status of Jesus (now democratically distributed to every identity), the evangelism of promoting the cause, the absolute sense of moral virtue--and, finally, the ruthlessness that goes with the delusion that one is morally superior and correct. To whatever degree this informs Wokism, then that also suggests a critique and countering of it will only work if one gets right underneath all of their hysterical claims and pronouncements. Rational argument won't work with the proponents and ideologists of Wokism. But one has to get really grounded in the true merits and meanings of the West, so one can reject guilt, not fall prey to Accusation (a key tool of Woke ideology, that has been remarkably effective in demoralizing the West), and affirm meaning in Western tradition (which, paradoxically, the entire world has adopted/is adopting to some degree or other while also rejecting it). Ultimately, of course, Wokism becomes about power, but that's another level of the issue...
Great letter, nice work!
I've been an Ontario high school teacher for 25 years. I've come up with a sideshow based on Jordan Peterson's lectures to help combat the gender ideology and social justice movement. Do you know how best to share this resource?
Thanks,
BM
Thanks! Feel free to email me!
Chanelpfahl@gmail.com
Of course this is preposterous. We must all get behind Chanel. She has chosen her path of self respect and educational sanity. I still believe the woke are a little dog with a big bark. In time they will whimper and run. Chanel has to stand her ground. This is her remarkable contribution to school children everywhere.
Dear Chanel it truly is almost impossible for me to believe that the slides you showed can actually exist anywhere in Canada. I thank God every day my children are past the elementary stage. I fret for my grandchildren, to say this curriculum is toxic and vile, is honestly putting it kindly. Surely this kind of education can be removed completely from the school system, or else the school system needs to be disbanded completely!
What a smackdown...way to go Chanel! I think you were wise to respond to these allegations and expose them for how ridiculous they are.
Keep fighting the good fight, for you ARE on the right side of history on this.
"Gender ideology" - a farce inside a bigger farce, was brought in by a nefarious govn't in 2015, which has gone above and beyond to make it "a thing." Clue: Pride SEASON. Even the true gay community is against all of this!
One should honestly be asking, "Of the number of indoctrinated souls, how many were seen by "the medical society" and how many were given "drugs" to fight off superimposed, social media perpetuated and falsely identified depression because of it?"
And: How many of the pushers of this 'agenda' are getting paid to do so? Did they sell their souls for riches? Follow the money. ALWAYS follow the money!
TOO many hoaxes. Not enough TRUTHS!
When God says He is against it, opinions don't matter!
No matter how colorful, sideways, or "authoritative " the opinions are.
Great work.
Stand Fast.
Stay True.
Remain Strong.
AND GOD BLESS YOU INDEED!
Much Love
I'm continually dealing with this mindset at our school. The admin has jumped in with both feet and trying desperately to drag everyone else down under.
Our jobs are not about what, but how to think.
Excellent reply and stay strong.
Since this is the 4rth time this "College" has harrassed you and attempted to intimidate you, once again threatening your teaching certificate (and arguably your livelihood as well; especially since I have heard you say that you "used to be a teacher", if memory serves), it's about time you got serious and simply indicted these bullies. The intimidation offence in Canada's Criminal Code reads, quote
423. (1) Every one who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of COMPELLING another person to ABSTAIN from doing anything that he has a lawful right to do, or TO DO anything that he has a lawful right to ABSTAIN from doing
(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or his spouse or children or INJURES HIS PROPERTY,
(b) intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats that in Canada or elsewhere, violence OR OTHER INJURY will be done to or PUNISHMENT WILL BE INFLICTED ON HIM or a relative of his, or that THE PROPERTY of any of them will BE DAMAGED
(c) persistently FOLLOWS that person from PLACE to place,
(d) hides any tools, clothes or other PROPERTY OWNED or USED by that person or DEPRIVES HIM OF THEM or HINDERS HIM in the USE OF THEM
(e) ... [irrelevant; talks about following a person on highway] ...
(f) ... [irrelevant; besets or watches someone in their dwelling] ...
(g) ... [again irrelevant; blocking a highway] ...
is GUILTY of an OFFENCE punishable on summary conviction. [endquote]
I presume, but I could be wrong about the presumption, that your teaching certificate is your property, even though it has been issued by a teaching authority to your person and may be removed from your person for a legal or so-called "just cause". As far as the Statute above is concerned, your teaching certificate could be the PROPERTY that the college and complainants want to deprive you of or hinder you from using in order to PUNISH you and/or to COMPEL you to ABSTAIN from further criticisms of the "woke" agenda. Arguably various "wokesters" are metaphorically persistently "following" you around social media and repetitively complaining about you to deprive you of your certificate.
Were I you, I wouldn't bother suing. It is a very simple thing to go to the police with a complaint or even directly to a Crown Prosecutor. You may also simply walk into any Court of Law in Ontario and lay an information against that "College" in accordance with Section 504. of Canada's Criminal Code which reads, quote:
504. Any one who, on reasonable grounds, believes that a person has committed an indictable offence may lay an information in writing and under oath before a justice and the justice SHALL receive the information where it is alleged
(a) that the person has committed, anywhere, an indictable offence that may be tried in the Province in which the Justice presides and that the person etc. etc.
The immediate objection would be that intimidation is a "summary conviction" offence, not an indictable offence, to which one could reply. Yes! But this offence might be considered extortion, contrary to Sect. 346. of the criminal code and may involve collusion between "wokesters" within the Ontario Teacher's College, contrary to Sect. 137. of Canada's Criminal Code --- given the repetitive complaints and harrassment from different individuals with the same apparent "modus" of silencing legitimate criticism of their doctrinaire behaviour.
Simply persuading a police officer to take your complaint in writing, which requires you to provide a copy to the person complained of, would, quite likely, scare the crap out of these bullies. But it would be much better to talk to a Crown Prosecutor --- given that they, quite often, do not like unreliable and often "prevaricating" snitches.
In sum, the law gives you much leeway with dimwitted bullies. Not so with James McMurtry. Ms. Mohammed and her mouthpiece have "got you", James, on factors "a." and "c." of Paragraph 23. of their Consent Resolution Agreement. So you must fight back against the falsity of factor "b.", which is the false part of their Criminal Code Sect. 321. C.C.C. false document "b" which is, quote "false in a material particular" and which justifies you "whistle-blowing" the fraud of the TRC and those so-called "Nations" which benefited from the fraudulent so-called "Day Scholars" suit initiated by the Secwepemc and joined by Cowessess etc. "Nations" in their 2015 Class Action suit vs. Canada. Tick Tock, James. I was mistaken when I said you only had until the 28th of August. It's by the 25th of August that they want a reply.
Kevin
I have emailed you...sorry for delay!
The only way the gender ideologists succeed is by continually claiming victim status and the aura of "more than human" that goes with it. The claimed victims are painted as more than human (in their suffering, their personal journey, their victory)--but their allies and protectors also gain this status. The corresponding implication is that anyone who is contrary to gender ideology is oppressive and evil. If this all sounds like Christianity appropriated and re-deployed--it is! Why and how? Well, in my view, the "progressive" postmodern mind has rejected all ties with Western meaning and tradition--and this includes rationality. Thus the postmodern "progressives" have put themselves entirely in the realm of the non-rational, the emotional, the subjective. But, because meaning and a sense of tradition are integral aspects of being human, then these same postmodern progressives--floating in their emotional subjectivity--have a desperate need for tradition and meaning. So they just start making up new things that they can attribute meaning and tradition to. These are all the Woke causes (more of which are being created/evolved every day, in the panic of the total irrational and meaning-less mind). But what is the structure and vehicle of these causes? Well, of course it is that very same Western tradition and meaning they rejected--but which has created, informed and cultivated our culture and our minds (like it or not) to begin with! And the biggest structure of it all is Christianity. Thus, if you look closely, you notice that Wokism adopts and redeploys all the tropes of Christianity: the sacrifice, victimhood and "more than human" status of Jesus (now democratically distributed to every identity), the evangelism of promoting the cause, the absolute sense of moral virtue--and, finally, the ruthlessness that goes with the delusion that one is morally superior and correct. To whatever degree this informs Wokism, then that also suggests a critique and countering of it will only work if one gets right underneath all of their hysterical claims and pronouncements. Rational argument won't work with the proponents and ideologists of Wokism. But one has to get really grounded in the true merits and meanings of the West, so one can reject guilt, not fall prey to Accusation (a key tool of Woke ideology, that has been remarkably effective in demoralizing the West), and affirm meaning in Western tradition (which, paradoxically, the entire world has adopted/is adopting to some degree or other while also rejecting it). Ultimately, of course, Wokism becomes about power, but that's another level of the issue...